Rethinking the ontological argument : a neoclassical theistic response  hardback

Daniel A. Dombrowski

In recent years, the ontological argument and theistic metaphysics have been criticised by philosophers working in both the analytic and continental traditions. Responses to these criticisms have primarily come from philosophers who make use of the traditional, and problematic, concept of God. In this 2006 volume, Daniel A. Dombrowski defends the ontological argument against its contemporary critics, but he does so by using a neoclassical or process concept of God, thereby strengthening the case for a contemporary theistic metaphysics. Relying on the thought of Charles Hartshorne, he builds on Hartshorne's crucial distinction between divine existence and divine actuality, which enables neoclassical defenders of the ontological argument to avoid the familiar criticism that the argument moves illegitimately from an abstract concept to concrete reality. His argument, thus, avoids the problems inherent in the traditional concept of God as static.

「Nielsen BookData」より

[目次]

  • Introduction
  • 1. Historical background
  • 2. Poetry v. the ontological argument: Richard Rorty's challenge
  • 3. Deconstructionism and the ontological argument: the case of Mark Taylor
  • 4. Is the ontological argument worthless?: Graham Oppy's rejection
  • 5. Oppy, perfect islands, and existence as a predicate
  • 6. Rival concepts of God and the ontological argument: Thomas Morris, Katherin Rogers and Alvin Plantinga.

「Nielsen BookData」より

この本の情報

書名 Rethinking the ontological argument : a neoclassical theistic response
著作者等 Dombrowski, Daniel A.
Dombrowski Daniel
巻冊次 hardback
出版元 Cambridge University Press
刊行年月 2006
ページ数 vii, 172 p.
大きさ 24 cm
ISBN 0521863694
NCID BA77870461
※クリックでCiNii Booksを表示
言語 英語
出版国 アメリカ合衆国
この本を: 
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

このページを印刷

外部サイトで検索

この本と繋がる本を検索

ウィキペディアから連想