Moral theory and capital punishment

Tom Sorell

This book concerns not only capital punishment but also the use of philosophical theories of right and wrong. The author argues that such theories are not to be regarded as giving expert knowledge of right and wrong, still less expert guidance in the resolution of practical dilemmas. What they can do however is to improve moral rhetoric, raise the standard of persuasive speech for and against capital punishment, abortion, and euthanasia to name a few. By introducing more rigour into the justification and criticism of these practices, he then applies philosophical criticism to some moral rhetoric in a Parliamentary debate on capital punishment. He moves on to show how normative ethical theories can provide some of the required justification. Two influential normative ethical theories - utilitarian and Kantian - are described and applied to the morality of capital punishment. In the end a Kantian argument in favour of the death penalty for a small range of crimes is accepted. Arguments on the other side, both utilitarian and non-utilitarian including several taken from US Supreme Court opinions in the 1970s are given consideration. Though the book argues that capital punishment can be morally justified, it concedes that workable capital punishment legislation may be very difficult to frame.

「Nielsen BookData」より


  • Selected problems - how philosophy can help
  • a selected controversy
  • capital punishment in philosophical context
  • utilitarian arguments for and against capital punishment
  • just desert.

「Nielsen BookData」より


書名 Moral theory and capital punishment
著作者等 Sorell, Tom
出版元 B. Blackwell
B. Blackwell in association with the Open University
刊行年月 1987
ページ数 viii, 172 p.
大きさ 22 cm
ISBN 0631153225
NCID BA03488553
※クリックでCiNii Booksを表示
言語 英語
出版国 イギリス