The Supreme Court Review  1960 ~ 2016

edited by Philip B. Kurland

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticism of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."--"Ethics" <br>"The Supreme Court Review" keeps you at the forefront of the Court's most significant decisions by surveying its origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law and compelling you to consider the impacts of legal institutions and judicial opinion. Diverse essays of informed analyses of past and present opinions document the complexities of the Court and relevant public law issues. Legal scholars, lawyers, judges, historians, political scientists, economists, and journalists have won acclaim for their contributions to each volume.<br>

「Nielsen BookData」より

"Some of the best researched and most thoughtful criticisms of recent decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court."--Ethics <br>Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration. <p>

「Nielsen BookData」より

"The Supreme Court Review" provides a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For fifty years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. "The Review" is an indepth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, designed to be at the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-eight years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, at the forefront of studies of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, and numerous first and fourth amendment cases. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous concerns and attitudes and discuss the implications of court decisions.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-five years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-nine years, the "Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. "The Review" is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For forty-nine years, the "Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, one that strives to keep on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, the United States v. American Library Association case, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Consisting of diverse essays by distinguished lawyers, historians, and social scientists, each volume presents informed analyses of past and present opinions and discusses important public law issues that have come under Court consideration.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since it first appeared in 1960, the "Supreme Court Review" has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment, and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on "Prigg v. Pennsylvania"; Richard H. Fallon, Jr. on sexual harassment, content neutrality, and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority, and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since it first appeared in 1960, this review has provided a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania ; Richard H. Fallon, Jr on sexual harassment, content neutrality and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since its inception in 1960, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, Federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues, sentiments, and the implications of Court decisions.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since its inception in 1960, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussions of the Court's most significant decisions. Distinguished participants hereanalyze current and previous public issues and sentiments and discuss the implications of court decisions.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Since its inception in 1960, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. Recent volumes have considered issues such as the 2000 elections in Florida, federalism and state sovereignty, the Boerne v. Flores case, and numerous Fourth Amendment issues. Distinguished participants analyze current and previous public issues and sentiments, as well as the implications of Court decisions.

「Nielsen BookData」より

Skeptical Scrutiny of Plenary Power: Judicial and Executive Branch Decision Making in Miller v. AlbrightCornelia T.L. Pillard and T. Alexander Aleinikoff The New Etiquette of Federalism: New York, Printz, and YeskeyMatthew Adler and Seth KreimerThe McCleskey Puzzle: Remedying Prosecutorial Discrimination Against Black Victims in Capital SentencingEvan Tsen Lee and Ashutosh Bhagwat State Taxation and the Dormant Commerce Clause: The Object-Measure ApproachJesse H. Choper and Tung YinLight on a Darkling Plain: Intercircuit Conflicts in the Perspective of Time and ExperienceArthur D. HellmanThe Plessy EraMichael J Klarman

「Nielsen BookData」より

The 1993 review of decisions made by the Supreme Court of the United States includes articles by: Laurence H. Tribe on hate-crime and animal sacrifice; Cass R. Sunstein on standing injuries; Joseph L. Hoffman and William J. Stuntz on Habeas after the revolution; Rebecca L. Brown on political questions affecting individual rights; Daniel R. Fischel and Alan O. Sykes on civil RICO After Reves; Jack M. Beermann on the narrow view on civil rights; Pamela S. Karlan on the Court's voting rights trilogy; Kenneth W. Dam on the Hartford fire case; and Dean Alfange, Jr on Marbury vs Madison.

「Nielsen BookData」より

For fifty years, "The Supreme Court Review" has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the court's most significant decisions. The Review is an indepth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross-burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.

「Nielsen BookData」より

[目次]

  • Skeptical Scrutiny of Plenary Power: Judicial and Executive Branch Decision Making in Miller v. Albright Cornelia T.L. Pillard and T. Alexander Aleinikoff The New Etiquette of Federalism: New York, Printz, and Yeskey Matthew Adler and Seth Kreimer The McCleskey Puzzle: Remedying Prosecutorial Discrimination Against Black Victims in Capital Sentencing Evan Tsen Lee and Ashutosh Bhagwat State Taxation and the Dormant Commerce Clause: The Object-Measure Approach Jesse H. Choper and Tung Yin Light on a Darkling Plain: Intercircuit Conflicts in the Perspective of Time and Experience Arthur D. Hellman The Plessy Era Michael J Klarman

「Nielsen BookData」より

[目次]

  • Which Question? Which Lie? Reflections on the Physician-Assisted Suicide Cases Martha Minow The Value of Seeing Things Differently: Boerne v Flores and Congressional Enforcement of the Bill of Rights David Cole Congressional Power and Religious Liberty after City of Boerne v Flores Christopher L. Eisgruber, Lawrence G. Sager. Freedom of Speech, Shielding Children, and Transcending Balancing Eugene Volokh Printz, State Sovereignty, and the Limits of Formalism Evan H. Caminker O'Hagan's Problems Victor Brudney Traffic Stops, Minority Motorists, and the Future of the Fourth Amendment David A. Sklansky Entrenching the Duopoly: Why the Supreme Court Should not Allow the States to Protect the Democrats and Republicans from Political Competition Richard L. Hasen "The Ideal New Frontier Judge" Dennis J. Hutchinson The Court and the Corporation: Jurisprudence, Localism, and Federalism Gregory A. Mark Do not Go Gently into that Good Right: the First Amendment in the High Court of Australia Gerald N. Rosenberg, John M. Williams.

「Nielsen BookData」より

この本の情報

書名 The Supreme Court Review
著作者等 Casper, Gerhard
Hutchinson, Dennis J.
Kurland, Philip B.
Stone, Geoffrey R.
Strauss, David A.
Casper G.
Hutchinson D.
etc.
巻冊次 1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
出版元 University of Chicago Press
刊行年月 1960-
版表示 74
ページ数 v.
大きさ 25 cm
ISBN 0226095711
0226095738
0226095746
0226362477
0226362485
0226362493
0226362507
0226362515
0226363112
0226363120
0226363139
0226363147
0226363163
0226363171
0226363198
0226363201
0226363236
0226363252
0226464229
0226464237
0226464245
0226464253
0226464261
0226464288
0226464296
0226464318
0226464326
0226464334
0226464342
0226464350
0226464369
0226464377
0226464385
0226464393
0226464407
0226464415
0226464210
9780226052014
9780226158730
9780226269061
9780226362533
9780226362557
9780226362564
9780226363264
9780226392219
9780226490847
9780226362526
NCID BA0103735X
※クリックでCiNii Booksを表示
言語 英語
出版国 アメリカ合衆国
この本を: 
このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加

Yahoo!ブックマークに登録
この記事をクリップ!
Clip to Evernote
このページを印刷

外部サイトで検索

この本と繋がる本を検索

ウィキペディアから連想